mouse anti chicken mhcii (SouthernBiotech)
Structured Review

Mouse Anti Chicken Mhcii, supplied by SouthernBiotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 31 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse anti chicken mhcii/product/SouthernBiotech
Average 93 stars, based on 31 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Generation and characterization of chicken monocyte-derived dendritic cells"
Article Title: Generation and characterization of chicken monocyte-derived dendritic cells
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1517697
Figure Legend Snippet: List of antibodies.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Phenotype analysis of chicken adherent PBMCs cultured 5 days in presence of GM-CSF and IL-4. (A) Gating strategy for flow cytometry analysis of chicken MoDCs based on FSC and SSC properties and singlets were selected from the FSC-A versus FSC-H. Dead cells were excluded using a viability dye. (B) Representative histograms of putative CD11c expression in adherent PBMCs incubated for 5 days only with non-supplemented complete medium (white) or in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 (blue). The background staining was evaluated using an isotype control (grey). Numbers on histograms represent the percentage of putative CD11c+ among live cells. (C) Boxplot of the percentage of putative CD11c+ cells among viable cells. Each symbol (circle or square) represents an individual chicken in the corresponding condition (n = 8). **p < 0.005, two-tailed paired t-test. (D) Representative contour plots of MHCII expression in adherent PBMCs incubated for 5 days with non-supplemented complete medium or in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4. Numbers represent the percentage of MHCII+ cells among viable cells. (E) Boxplot of the percentage of MHCII+ cells among viable cells. Each symbol (circle or square) represents an individual chicken in the corresponding condition (n=8). A non-parametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to determine statistical differences (**p < 0.005).
Techniques Used: Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Incubation, Staining, Control, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: LPS stimulation increased MHCII and co-stimulatory molecules expressions, and IL-12p40 secretion. Flow cytometry was used to analyze unstimulated and LPS-stimulated MoDCs for their expression of MHCII, CD80, and CD40 after 6 and 24 h (A) Representative contour plots of MHCII with numbers on plots representing the percentage of MHCII+ cells gated on live cells and the MFI of MHCII+ cells. (B) The upper panel represents the percentage of MHCII+ cells among viable cells. Each circle represents an individual chicken in the corresponding condition. A non-parametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was used to determine statistical differences (ns, not significant). The lower panel represents MHCII MFI determined on viable MHCII+ cells. Each circle represents an individual chicken in the corresponding condition. A two-tailed paired t-test was used to determine statistical differences (****p<0.0001). (C) Representative flow cytometry histograms of CD80 (left panel), and CD40 (right panel) expressions in unstimulated cells (blue), LPS-stimulated MoDCs (orange), and isotype control (grey) after 6 and 24 h Numbers on histograms indicate the MFI values of the corresponding marker. (D) Boxplot of CD80 (upper panel) and CD40 (bottom panel) expression measured as MFI normalized to the isotype control. Each circle represents an individual chicken in the corresponding condition. A two-tailed paired t-test and a non-parametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test were used to determine statistical differences (**p<0.01; ***p<0.001). The data from 3 independent experiments are displayed (n=14). (E) The production of IL-12p40 was quantified in the supernatants of unstimulated or LPS-stimulated MoDCs at 6 and 24 h by ELISA. Data are presented as boxplots with individual chicken values represented by circles. A two-tailed paired t-test was used to determine statistical differences (***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001). Data from two independent experiments (n=8) are displayed.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Two Tailed Test, Control, Marker, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay
